A good syntax for generics
Actually this is funnier as a multiple choice.
Tbh, <T> is great, I wish we didn't need those symbols for anything else.
@virtulis my favourite is the C++ oopsie, where >> is an operator and you can't (or couldn't, when I was using C++) write <M<A>> without a space. 🙂
But I think both Rust and Typescript handle template style polymorphism quite ergonomically!
@jonn Except for the part where you have to write Type<T,> in .tsx 
@jonn I'm not sure what I wrote is required but one case it certainly is if you're a weirdo and like writing stuff like
const fn = <A> (a: A) => ...
Cause that's obviously an opening JSX tag. Adding a comma helps disambiguate (and pisses off ESLint).
The reason I meh'd at Haskell stuff is because I want this to be implicit unless actually needed (as in TS).
So not as worried about definitions as being able to write let rgb = image.convert<RGB>() or let rgb: Image<RGB> = image.convert() or let rgb: Image = image.convert(); rgb.at(0,0).red = 0; (etc)
Which kind of calls for a specific syntax construct that is never expected and almost always allowed.
@virtulis also, what does it mean